![]() ![]() ![]() Given the opportunity cost and possible future customers, it makes no sense to close something down if it is getting enough investment revenue to keep the company going. Sometimes it is a balance of doing things sustainably or the whole business is going to fold anyway if it is setup without diversified income streams. It all comes down to how ethical a business is. They could choose to do so if they wanted. I guess they decided not to follow this route and they created their own problems with so many people still on XP. Microsoft has its own problems with people hanging onto an old OS with a one-off payment. ![]() So, I guess it is in a way a lot like companies that sell products, get cash and then aren't able to put all of it into R&D because there aren't going to be that many more customers, so they have to find another way to boost the income to make it sustainable. That's 10 off the regular price of 49.99, which itself is a colossal savings. Returning to the model, if you look closely, the firm is still able to generate more revenue through additional one-off payments from new customers. For a limited time, you can get a lifetime 2TB Zoolz dual cloud-storage subscription for 39.99. I know a few countries that are currently giving out grants including Canada and the United Kingdom. It's sustainable if it reaches critical mass.įurthermore, these tech startups may also be getting subsidies from the government. It's not new, maybe the way I described it is a bit confusing, but it happens all the time. You would be surprised how many companies run on this model / something similar even if all revenue isn't derived from one source… The big one is probably Apple, which reinvests spare cash into other industries. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |